🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, though, may align so closely with the mythologized image promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a tailor-made persona of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a television show released last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “rescue” the nation from disorder. While the character's name Mikhail, the message is clear: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in buttressing this identical story instead of undercutting it. A new film inspired by a popular book aims to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, moving the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is shown as having been chosen by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with him to accept the role. The presidency was in essence a casting call with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who expected to run the country in practice.

• The shortlist included various figures, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• According to a journalist who researched Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the required parameters: obedient, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the events said the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “spy” may in part have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. The grittier interpretation led Russian media and online audiences to draw visual parallels with Putin. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with his appeared on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's omission of public dissent, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. He is signaled through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.