🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a increasing group of states are exploring parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "an tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a bill lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic statement calling for a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is granted. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," stated the MEP behind the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "based on conclusive data".

Last year, interest gathered behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, legislation is primarily happening at the local government level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional use needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some politicians to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation continues, the actions of the Australian government and others indicate that governments around the world are less and less willing to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.