🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are compensated to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since that time, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the celebration is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A campaign to erase Black history and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and provides room for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who observe it should not be comforted with the passive language of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.